This is a legacy website for the Behavioural Design Lab. It is no longer updated.
Behavioural Design Lab Subscribe Bird Contact

The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment

Psychology, ethics, rationality

Abstract

Research on moral judgment has been dominated by rationalist models, in which moral judgment is thought to be caused by moral reasoning. The author gives 4 reasons for considering the hypothesis that moral reasoning does not cause moral judgment; rather, moral reasoning is usually a post hoc construction, generated after a judgment has been reached. The social intuitionist model is presented as an alternative to rationalist models. The model is a social model in that it deemphasizes the private reasoning done by individuals and emphasizes instead the importance of social and cultural influences. The model is an intuitionist model in that it states that moral judgment is generally the result of quick, automatic evaluations (intuitions). The model is more consistent than rationalist models with recent findings in social, cultural, evolutionary, and biological psychology, as well as in anthropology and primatology. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)

View fulltext on journal website...

Related content

Chatting About Time Management With The Godfather Of Irrationality, Dan Ariely

Three stories about capitalism

I’m Dan Ariely, Author and Professor, and This Is How I Work

© 2015 Warwick Business School and the Design Council